Comments on: Google’s No-Follow Change and PageRank Sculpting http://syedaqeel.com/2009/06/googles-no-follow-change-and-pagerank-sculpting/ Learn How to Make Money Online Blogging & Freelancing Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:19:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Google NOFOLLOW Change (and why this isn’t news) http://syedaqeel.com/2009/06/googles-no-follow-change-and-pagerank-sculpting/comment-page-1/#comment-239 Google NOFOLLOW Change (and why this isn’t news) Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:39:21 +0000 http://syedaqeel.com/?p=193#comment-239 [...] Google’s No-Follow Change and PageRank Sculpting | Make Money … – [...] [...] Google’s No-Follow Change and PageRank Sculpting | Make Money … – [...]

]]> By: Mike http://syedaqeel.com/2009/06/googles-no-follow-change-and-pagerank-sculpting/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Mike Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:11:29 +0000 http://syedaqeel.com/?p=193#comment-201 Interesting post. However, I don't see how this change will "encourage blog spam" if as Daniel Socco pointed out the page being linked to will not receive any extra pagerank or anchor text value from the link? It seems to me that Google has effectively plugged the hole at both ends so to speak preventing the abuse of the nofollow tag both for the webmaster and the spammer. While I don't like it as much as the next webmaster it is an effective way to protect the integrity of Google's index as they say. (sorry about the previous post, messed up on the html attribute) Interesting post. However, I don’t see how this change will “encourage blog spam” if as Daniel Socco pointed out the page being linked to will not receive any extra pagerank or anchor text value from the link? It seems to me that Google has effectively plugged the hole at both ends so to speak preventing the abuse of the nofollow tag both for the webmaster and the spammer. While I don’t like it as much as the next webmaster it is an effective way to protect the integrity of Google’s index as they say.

(sorry about the previous post, messed up on the html attribute)

]]> By: Mike http://syedaqeel.com/2009/06/googles-no-follow-change-and-pagerank-sculpting/comment-page-1/#comment-200 Mike Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:09:55 +0000 http://syedaqeel.com/?p=193#comment-200 Interesting post. However, I don't see how this change will <blockquote cite="encourage blog spam"> if as Daniel Socco pointed out the page being linked to will not receive any extra pagerank or anchor text value from the link? It seems to me that Google has effectively plugged the hole at both ends so to speak preventing the abuse of the nofollow tag both for the webmaster and the spammer. While I don't like it as much as the next webmaster it is an effective way to protect the integrity of Google's index as they say.</blockquote> Interesting post. However, I don’t see how this change will
if as Daniel Socco pointed out the page being linked to will not receive any extra pagerank or anchor text value from the link? It seems to me that Google has effectively plugged the hole at both ends so to speak preventing the abuse of the nofollow tag both for the webmaster and the spammer. While I don’t like it as much as the next webmaster it is an effective way to protect the integrity of Google’s index as they say.

]]>